LES ANNALES DES MINES
Gérer & Comprendre n°99 March 2010
FOR OUR ENGLISH-SPEAKING READERS
TESTIFYING Ultraliberalism, the enemy of modern
management? From
the French Communist Party to management consultancy: an uncommon
itinerary, an
exceptional experience with social relations in firms…
The
practices for managing the responsible social investment funds created
by
Protestant groups are placed in a historical and sociological
perspective.
Those of the four funds described, beyond the possible ambiguities
stemming
from their theological justifications, are characterized by a
pragmatism that
is a far cry from their supposed dogmatism. These practices transcend
their
religious origins. These funds raise relevant questions about the
rehabilitation of finance and the conception of corporate social
responsibility.
In-firm
training periods
are an opportunity for young people to discover the world of work from
a
position somewhere between that of observer and player. When the
internship
lasts several months, as in the case of engineering students from the
Écoles
des Mines, students try to fill the same assignments as young recruits.
They
thus gain an original view of the firm “from underneath”, we might say.
With
reference to a recent article in Gérer & comprendre,
they feel
invited to identify with ideal role models. But this identification is
alienating. The only way to overcome it is for students to obtain a
position
that enables them to understand that the images with which they have
identified
are mere appearances. Identification is especially strong when the
internship
is in consultancy on corporate strategy, where appearances and very
codified
relations are key factors. These students’ naive view, as seen through
their
accounts of this training experience, provides us with thoughts about
how
business is conducted. For this reason, we are publishing a text
written during
an internship that was part of the author’s first year of training for
the
French Corps des Mines. TRIAL BY FACT Territoriality and virtual offices, an
oxymoron? Changes
in the organization of work and the determination to reduce the budget
allotted
to office space have led many firms to reinvent, or even eliminate,
offices
thanks to modern technology. Evidence of this is the development of
“shared
workplaces”. The workplace is not just a functional space however. It
is also
one of the symbols linking wage-earners to their company. Wage-earners
spontaneously try to make the workplace their own. A case study
conducted in
the virtual offices of Accenture shows how a sense of territory arises
and
marks every space, even virtual spaces.
By placing
the interests
of other stakeholders (for instance, employees) on a par with those of
stockholders, corporate social responsibility has compelled recognition
in
recent years as a concrete form of sustainable development. Though
relatively
old, flexibility has become an increasingly accepted possibility for
improving
a firm’s competitiveness or even reorienting its activities in a new
direction
indispensable for its survival. Given its quantitative dimension
however,
flexibility often comes under criticism for its social consequences.
Precarious
employment conditions for wage-earners, competition over labor costs
among
subcontractors, the broken bond between a firm and its workers…
flexibility
turns out to be an “antisocial” practice. We thus fail to see how a
firm that
scrupulously adheres to the ideas underlying corporate social
responsibility
could implement flexibility in its human resources. In practice
however,
flexibility and corporate social responsibility seem to be able to live
under
the same roof. |
This
article describes
how an agribusiness plant adjusted to the deployment of a global tool
for
managing employee qualifications. Although this tool required
conformity, it
was appropriated variously, depending on the occupational environment
and the
context of the activities actually exercised.
Reputation
is brought forward as a major criterion for managing careers but
without being
clearly defined. An operational definition is proposed of this social
label or
image, which is constructed through human relations. The case of
artists is
especially useful for interpreting the processes at work; and
contemporary
poets provide a striking illustration of how individuals and, too,
organizations (in this case, publishers) manage reputations. Reputation
is both
a decision-making tool and a key element in strategies.
An
industry’s maturation often brings its business model under review.
Contrary to appearances, haute couture should be seen not just
through
the exuberance of top designers. These fashion houses have had to adapt
a
purely craftsman’s approach to changes in their historical customer
base. They
have done this thanks to two “product differentiations”: luxury goods
and
designer fashionware. This has deeply affected how they are organized.
Fashion
houses have found original solutions for moving beyond the
fashion/luxury
opposition and remaining, even yet, among the best profit-making
companies.
Behind the glamor and glitter, we discover a world with an atypical
structure
and organization that exercises fascination owing as much to the fine
strategies pursued as to the goods produced.
Michel
Villette: Marriage, capitalism and baby food: On Elizabeth Dunn’s Privatizing
Poland, baby food, big business and the remaking of labor,
(Cornell
University Press, 2004). |
|